How do i set up jbod

When you copy files to the JBOD array, the disks will fill up one-by-one. But if one drive fails, you lose the entire array. Perhaps there is recovery software that can recover files on the non failed drives, as long as the files did not cross drives as in, the file starts at the end of one drive, and ends at the start of the next drive.

With RAID 0, when you copy files to the drives, the files get split up evenly mostly, depending on the size of the files. The benefit is that if you have, for example, 10 drives in the array, then all 10 are writing the GB file at the same time, resulting in it taking the time for a 10GB file to be written because 10GB is being written to each of the 10 drives, simultaneously.

And recovery will be nearly impossible, because your plots will never be on a single drive. They will all be split evenly across all of the drives. This gives the RAID fault tolerance. You can have 1 drive failure any one drive in the RAID 5 can fail , and you will keep humming along.

If another drive fails, you are toast. So you go out and purchase a replacement for the failed drive. It will do this in the background, and you can use your computer while it does its magic however, heavy usage will delay the completion of the recovery.

JBOD will probably not care what mix of drives you use, because it simply stacks their capacity and uses no fancy calculations to keep them synced with each other. Does it matter If have a drive failure and loose lik 80x plots? I just replot. Thats why I go for each physical disk as its own volume. JBOD is dangerous, and not really needed. Docker config file is set as follows, example is with 2 volumes, but can be extended to infinite.

The regular models do not support any VM environment, including docker. Edit: VM is not docker. Docker is a different package, this is containerization , not virtual machines. What is your model? Not a super useful setup, but then, Chia is kind of an unusual setup itself…. Jbod just means that they appear seperately for the operating system, and are not controlled by the raid controller infront of the system which would hide the fact that these are xyz amount of drives If u make a single volume spanning across all drives or do a software raid ofc you get that issue Simple volumes are not that smart.

Given this faint praise, why would you consider using JBOD architecture? In a MSExchange. I recommend reading the article in full if you want more detail. Tom is also president of Coyote Moon, Inc.

The hard drives you use in the JBOD set can be of different sizes and from different manufacturers. If you're working on a Mac Pro, you can use any available internal drive bays. Otherwise, you'll need one or more external drive enclosures. When you zero out data, you force the hard drive to check for bad data blocks during the erasure process and mark any bad blocks as not to be used.

This step decreases the likelihood of losing data due to a failing block on the hard drive. It also increases the time it takes to erase the drives from a few minutes to an hour or more per drive. Select the drive, not the volume name that appears indented under the drive's name. Then, click the Erase tab. Enter a name for the volume in the Name field.

Click Erase. Give each hard drive a unique name. After the drives are erased, build the concatenated set. Click the RAID tab. It's time to add members, or slices, to the set and create the finished RAID volume. Drag one of the hard drives for the array from the left sidebar of Disk Utility onto the RAID array name you created in the previous step. Click Create. Click Create to continue. Consider the use of backup software that runs on a predetermined schedule.